![]() The articles admit that high contrast is best for most people, and especially the huge group of vision-impaired users, but claims that those with "Scoptic Sensitivity Syndrome" need lower contrast.Ī Google search for "Scoptic Sensitivity Syndrome" yields only 171 hits. Most sane people will adjust the brightness and contrast of their monitors we don't need individual web "designers" screwing things up with unreadable text that is different from site to site. No studies were mentioned and no non-subjective data provided. There are three huge flaws with its ideas, however: Those articles are the best justification, yet, that I have seen for text with unreadable contrast. You might want to read Designing for Dyslexics and the two follow on articles. Thanks, the more I look into this practice, the more it looks like unreasoned herd mentality. Like most design phases though, its usually the designers who decide rather than the end users. Its a phase just like the plainly stupid pixel font was a couple of years ago and hopefully it will move on just as that did. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |